AWSA WASBO WCASS WREA WASPA

« | Home | »

Update: School Finance Lawsuit and Ongoing Surplus Discussions

By Wisconsin School Administrators Alliance staff | February 26, 2026

Dear Members,

This week brought a notable development in Wisconsin’s ongoing conversation about public school funding. On Tuesday, a lawsuit was filed in Eau Claire County Circuit Court challenging the constitutionality of the state’s current school finance system.

The lawsuit asks the court to hold the Legislature accountable for meeting its constitutional responsibility to adequately fund public education, with the stated goal of ensuring that every Wisconsin student has an equal opportunity for an education.

The case, Wisconsin PTA, et al. v. Wisconsin Assembly, was filed by the Wisconsin PTA and Wisconsin Public Education Network, along with five school districts: Adams-Friendship, Beloit, Eau Claire, Green Bay, and Necedah. Additional plaintiffs include local education unions in four of those districts, as well as parents, teachers, students, taxpayers, and other community members from the affected communities. The plaintiffs are represented by Law Forward and the Wisconsin Education Association Council.

Named as defendants are the Wisconsin State Assembly, the Wisconsin State Senate, legislative leadership (including the Assembly Speaker, Senate President, and Senate Majority Leader), the Joint Finance Committee, and each member of the Joint Finance Committee.

The lawsuit requests the following claims for relief:

  1. This Court should declare that the Wisconsin public school finance system, and amounts appropriated for state aid, are inadequate because the Legislature has failed to meet its constitutional obligations to Wisconsin students under article X, section 3 of the Wisconsin Constitution.
  2. This Court should declare that the Wisconsin public school finance system, and the amount of state funding provided, does not support programming that is as uniform as practicable because the Legislature has failed to meet its constitutional obligations to Wisconsin students under article X, section 3 of the Wisconsin Constitution.
  3. This Court should declare that the Wisconsin public school finance program is inadequate because it does not account for student needs, caused by the Legislature’s failure to meet its constitutional obligations to all Wisconsin students under article X, section 3 of the Wisconsin Constitution.
  4. This Court should declare that the Wisconsin public school finance system is inadequate because it does not sufficiently fund special education, caused by the Legislature’s failure to meet its constitutional obligations to Wisconsin students under article X, section 3 of the Wisconsin Constitution.
  5. This Court should declare that the Wisconsin public school finance system is inadequate because it does not account for high need students and violates equal protection under article I, section 1 of the Wisconsin Constitution.
  6. This Court should declare that the Legislature’s inadequate state funding for public schools impermissibly deviates from first principles and violates the guarantee under article I, section 22, enjoyed by all Plaintiffs, that the State will maintain a free government.

The suit then asks that the Court:

  1. Declare that Wisconsin’s current school finance system violates Wisconsin Constitution article X, section 3, such that the school finance system is invalid;
  2. Declare that Wisconsin’s current school finance system violates Wisconsin Constitution article I, section 1, such that the school finance system is invalid;
  3. Declare that Wisconsin’s current school finance system violates Wisconsin Constitution article 1, section 22, such that the school finance system is invalid;
  4. Establish a schedule that will enable the Court—in the absence of a superseding state law, adopted by the Legislature and signed by the Governor in a timely fashion—to adopt and implement a new school finance system that meets all relevant state constitutional guarantees;
  5. Award Plaintiffs costs, disbursements, and reasonable fees incurred in bringing this action, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 814.01; and
  6. Grant such other relief as the Court deems proper.

The defendants have 45 days to respond to the complaint. A link to the full filing is available here.

This litigation is expected to unfold over an extended period of time. While the timeline and outcome remain uncertain, I will continue to monitor developments closely and provide updates as appropriate.

Surplus Negotiations

Although the State Assembly has adjourned its regular floor session for the year, Speaker Vos has publicly stated that the Legislature could return in a special or an extraordinary session to address the state’s projected surplus once negotiations with the Governor reach an agreement. Those conversations are ongoing.

Where negotiations last stood, legislative leadership had offered a package that included:

For school leaders, the most immediate and impactful opportunity remains ensuring that any final surplus agreement honors the state’s special education funding commitments and meaningfully addresses local property tax pressure. Continued engagement and advocacy during this narrow window are critical.

We will continue to monitor both the legal developments and the surplus negotiations closely and will keep you informed as new information becomes available.

Thank you for your continued advocacy on behalf of Wisconsin’s students and public schools.

Topics: Uncategorized | No Comments »

Comments are closed.